The choice isn’t between a more likable Kamala Harris or a less likable Donald Trump. It’s not about either of them.
It’s about a choice between two governing visions that are more divergent than at any time in my adult life.
There are questions that a properly curious media (assuming that such a thing exists) might want to ask Kamala Harris.
Character matters. But with respect to the presidency, policy matters more.
It can be fairly said that Democrats have a race fixation. Maybe call it a fetish.
Kamala Harris is a radical California progressive. But don’t take my word for it. Take hers.
Federal hiring continues to outpace the private sector even as federal office spaces sit largely empty most of the time.
Presidential debates in America have devolved into mere spectacles and are now largely a waste of time.
Biden wants to grant, via executive order, what amounts to amnesty to more than 500,000 illegal immigrants.
The Dems must feel like Wile E. Coyote. Every surefire ACME-inspired political explosive they have deployed against Donald Trump has detonated in their faces.
Just as Donald Trump’s farcical conviction can be set right by fixing the reversible errors of the trial judge, so too can America be set right by fixing the reversible errors of bad policy.
We have a third world-worthy example of election interference thanks to a legal system that is losing the respect of ordinary Americans every day.
Based on what we’ve seen at oral arguments, it appears that the Supreme Court has at last taken notice of these very real constitutional concerns.