Joe Biden’s holy crusade.
President Joe Biden is waging an obsessive and destructive jihad on fossil fuels.
President Joe Biden is waging an obsessive and destructive jihad on fossil fuels.
It’s becoming increasingly likely that the eventual Republican nominee won’t be facing a feeble, failing and scandal plagued Joe Biden next year. It’s also likely that Donald Trump will be convicted of at least one felony next year.
Until such time as the justice system’s asymmetric treatment of Donald Trump as compared to Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden is addressed, there is zero chance that prosecutors will have the country behind them in criminally prosecuting a former president.
The intention via the Hunter Biden plea deal that a federal judge rejected last week was to cloak a growing pile of evidence that the “Big Guy” himself is the most corrupt president in our nation’s 234 years as a Constitutional republic.
If Donald Trump stands credibly accused of criminally mishandling classified material, then so, too, does Hillary Clinton. Either you prosecute them both or you prosecute neither.
Armed with the fearsome powers of surveillance that the bureau acquired following 9/11, the FBI has nearly unlimited power to protect those whom it favors while destroying those that it does not.
It’s clear that in 2023 we’re no longer created equal. A small number of the wealthy and well connected in the ruling class enjoy privileges and immunities that are unavailable to you and me — the very thing for which the Founding Fathers and American colonists were willing to take up arms against the mighty British army.
If your last name is Biden or Clinton, you enjoy the exclusive benefits of the Department of Justice’s Concierge Justice System.
Biden said he wasn’t going to give an inch and Speaker McCarthy made him give a couple of feet. (It was nowhere close to a mile.) But it all comes at the cost of raising the U.S. debt ceiling by $4.0 trillion.
It’s the biggest government corruption story in living memory. It’s the media actively avoiding it.
The federal government is spending more while taking in less. Understanding the consequences doesn’t require an Ivy-league degree.